Listening Empathy and Sales EffectivenessSept. 3, 2014
Susie Pryor, PhD and Avinash Malshe, PhD
Communication skills are the single most important determinant of effectiveness in both sales and sales management (Deeter-Schmetz, Goebel and Kennedy 2008). Poor listening behaviors by sales personnel contribute significantly to performance failure -- costing American businesses billions of dollars in revenues annually (Brownell 1990; Grossman 2011). Research confirms the importance of listening, determined its cognitive dimensions, and identified positive outcomes, including buyer loyalty. Researchers have begun to investigate affective components of listening – such as empathy and concern – and the relationship between these and adaptive selling and sales performance (cf., Castleberry and Shepherd 1993).
In this article, we report the findings of a study involving in-depth interviews with home buyers that concerns buyer perceptions of real estate agents’ listening behaviors. This work offers insight to real estate professionals concerning forms of listening and their role in building and maintaining long-term buyer-seller relationships (Aggarwal, Castlebery, Ridnour, and Shepherd 2005).
Interpersonal communication includes both outwardly-oriented (expressive) behaviors and inwardly-oriented or listening (recognition) behaviors (Nichols 1995). Listening behavior comprises three components: sensing, evaluating, and responding (Ramsey and Sohi 1997). Sensing (the initiation of listening behaviors stimulated by verbal and nonverbal cues) and evaluating (the assessment of customer statements to discover underlying meaning) are cognitive activities. Responding is behavioral and its purpose may be to inform, control, empathize or ritualize (Mead 1986). We know there is a positive association between listening perceptions and relational outcomes. Scholars have speculated that salespeople must engage in all three components of listening to be perceived as effective listeners (Ramsey and Sohi 1997).
While early researchers focused on cognitive features of listening, more recent work suggests that listening skills are best understood if examined within relational structures. In fact, it is argued that: the effectiveness of sales interactions is determined by the interpersonal interaction between the salesperson and the customer, relational listening is a communicative phenomenon enacted “in-relationship,” and the processes underlying relational communication may be productively understood by examining how relational partners account for the listening process (Halone and Pecchiono 2001; Williams and Spiro 1985).
Salespeople who display empathy may be particularly effective communicators. As the salesperson’s empathy increases, their level of listening increases, as does their subsequent effectiveness (Comer and Drollinger 1999). Empathy is the ability to accurately perceive the internal frame of reference of another as well as underlying emotions and meanings (Rogers 1959). When salespeople use active empathic listening (AEL) they attempt to intuitively assess the meanings underlying buyer messages by placing themselves in the customer’s place throughout the interaction (Comer and Drollinger 1999). From an AEL perspective, for interpersonal communication in the buyer-seller relationship to be effective, genuine concern (empathy) on the part of the salesperson is requisite.
Research finds a strong positive correlation between empathy and salesperson listening, trust in the salesperson, and satisfaction with the salesperson; trust and satisfaction, in turn, are positively related to future interaction expectations (Aggarwal, Castleberry, Ridnour, and Shepherd 2005).
Literature from diverse fields suggests that empathy has both cognitive and affective components (Duan and Hill 1996). The cognitive component, sometimes called perspective-taking or cognitive-role-taking, consists of an intellectual understanding of another person's situation (Barrett-Leonard 1962). The cognitive component involves understanding on an objective level. The affective component, sometimes called empathetic concern, consists of an internal emotional reaction that produces understanding of another's feelings (Allport 1961). The affective component is more difficult to explicate than is the cognitive component, since it involves emotional bonds between people that enable them to sense and process emotional states. A number of theorists have adopted the position that cognitive and affective aspects are both essential and work together (Brems 1989), while others feel that empathy can be either cognitive or affective depending on the situation (Gladstein 1983).
Because of our interest in developing a deeper understanding of buyer beliefs, feelings, and experiences, we conducted indepth interviews with 31 home buyers. Informants had established a commercial relationship with a realtor within the past 12 months. The length of the commercial relationship ranged from two to six months. Buyers ranged from 21 to 65 years in age; 52% were female and 40% were first-time home buyers.
From the buyer’s perspective, every characteristic of listening (sensing, evaluating, responding) has both cognitive and affective characteristics. That is, sellers signal simultaneously the extent to which they understand buyers’ needs and concerns and the extent to which they care about such needs. In this study, buyers identified empathetic listening behaviors as key to the development of long-term buyer-seller relationships.
Buyers were alert to the extent to which their realtor paid attention to what they were saying, as well as whether the salesperson appeared aware of buyers’ verbal and non-verbal cues. Buyers themselves were sensitive to nonverbal aspects of the salesperson’s listening (sensing) in the form of their facial expressions, body language, gestures, alertness, and/or maintaining eye contact. As a result, our study suggests that each of the three dimensions of listening sensing, evaluating, and responding have affective and cognitive dimensions.
Not surprisingly, buyers found realtors to possess greater understanding of their needs over time. Importantly, buyers attributed this not merely to an accumulation of information by the realtor but an indicator of a shift in the realtor’s perspective towards a more relational and empathetic viewpoint. Buyers discussed this in terms of both cognitive and behavior components of the realtor’s performance. Many buyers talked about whether they felt their realtors were trying to gain a more relational-level of understanding of them or simply viewed them as just “customers” looking for a service -- a purely transactional-level assessment (Comer and Drollinger 1999).
Finally, when evaluative communication is imbued with affect (such as empathy or caring), customers perceived the seller to be more effective at sales. Realtors who were perceived to be empathetic listeners showed houses which better met buyers’ needs and interests (creating efficiency for all parties), provided more ancillary information (e.g., regarding loans, schools, churches), met with buyers at times convenient to them, and communicated through means appropriate to the buyers’ own modes of communication.
Implications for Real Estate Professionals
This study offers insight useful to real estate agents in terms of understanding buyer attitudes and expectations. Customers are not naïve and they fully know that salespeople employ various strategies to create a positive impression. Yet, buyers expect appropriate sales behaviors which serve as important cues into the realtor’s level of attention to buyer needs and also to the realtor’s level of empathy.
To test this concept, study participants were also asked about how much they valued the socially embedded real estate transaction tasks that go beyond simple information search functions. Results show that there is a significant positive relationship for both buyers and sellers in terms of how much they value socially embedded tasks and how much they value and are likely to use real estate professionals in the future. When potential clients are aware that specialized skills and expertise are required for an optimized real estate transaction and also recognize that they, themselves, are likely not up to the task, both buyers and sellers will tend to perceive higher agent value and also have a greater likelihood of using an agent in the future.
Conclusion and Recommendations
With the wide availability of e-information comes a reduction in the perceived usefulness of real estate professionals in the area of information search. Such a contextual change threatens client perceptions of an agent’s value and likelihood of future use of agent services. Based on these results, some level of industry disintermediation could be anticipated. On the other hand, if potential clients are made aware of the diverse and important socially embedded tasks that take place in the context of successful real estate transactions, prospective clients will tend to value and use the services of real estate professionals at higher levels and disintermediation will be less likely.
Few would be surprised to learn that there is a strong relationship between listening skills and buyers’ perceptions of sales effectiveness and satisfaction (Aggarwal, Castleberry, Ridnour and Shepherd 2005; Ramsey and Sohi 1997). However, this study suggests that all listening is not equal. Buyers want not only evidence that the real estate agent has heard and understood them, but that the agent has a genuine interest in the buyer. Agents, then, have the opportunity to enhance relationships merely by signaling to the buyer not only are needs understood, but also that they matter.
The expression of empathy is an important predictor of the maintenance of successful, stable relationships (Long 1993; Long and Andrews 1990). The good news for sales managers is that empathy is a trainable skill and has been developed for a number of groups, including high school students, college students, medical students, nursing staff and parents (Guerney 1988; Hatcher et al. 1994; Patore 1995, Herbeck and Yammarion 1990, Brems, Baldwin, and Baxter 1993). The focus of these programs is the creation of an environment conducive to the expression of empathy.
The impressions of affective and cognitive empathy created during sales interactions may play a key role in developing buyer-seller relationships. Specifically, our data suggest that when the realtors expressed the affective and cognitive components of empathy through listening activities as a part of their manner, buyers interpreted this as genuine concern for the outcome of the sales process. The examples buyers provide of these behaviors were generally very simple. Agents adjusted the air conditioning in the car to suit the customer, made reflective statements that drew upon past conversations with the buyer, and sent simple welcome gifts that reflected the buyer’s unique interests and lifestyle. On the other hand, non-empathetic realtors were liable to make statements that showed a disinterest in the problems a particular house purchase may create for the buyer in terms of improvements, neighborhood, school satisfaction, etc. Buyers were particularly reactive to negative evidence. In the words of one first-time home buyer, “She [the agent] said it was nothing – nothing! – to restore those hardwood floors!” The customer then recounted, in disgust, how he was forced to hold onto his home because of the massive repairs that his agent had dismissed.
Finally, consistent with traditional thinking in sales, buyers suggest that the number and duration of interactions with the agent increased understanding, communication, and relationship quality. Therefore, agents can simply create a strategy for increasing the number of interactions and communication quality with buyers in order to enhance trust and purchase intent.
The Role of Empathy in the Traditional Listening Model
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Aggarwal, Praveen, Stephen B. Castleberry, Rick Ridnour, and C. David Shepherd (2005), “Salesperson Empathy and Listening: Impact on Relationship Outcomes,” Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 13 (3), 16-30.
Allport, Gordon (1961), Pattern and Growth in Personality, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Andrews, David W. (1990), “Perspective-Taking as a Predictor of Marital Adjustment,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 126-31.
Angera, Jeffrey J., Sara Jacobs Carter, Mindy Nakamoto, and Michelle Kalso (1999), “Understanding the One You Love: A Longitudinal Assessment of an Empathy Training Program for Couples in Romantic Relationships,” Family Relations, 48, 235-42.
Barrett-Leonard, G. T. (1962), "Dimensions of Therapy Response as Causal Factors in Therapeutic Change," Psychological Monographs, 76, 1-33.
Brems, Christiane (1989), "Dimensionality of Empathy and Its Correlates," Journal of Psychology, 123 (4), 329-37.
Brems, D., J. Baldwin and S. Baxter (1993), “Empirical Evaluation of a Self-Psychologically Oriented Parent Orientation Program,” Family Relations. 42, 26-30.
Brownell, Judi (1990), “Perceptions of Effective Listeners: A Management Study,”The Journal of Business Communication, 27 (Fall), 401-15.
Castleberry, Stephen B., and C. David Shepherd (1993), “Effective Interpersonal Listening and Personal Selling,” Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 13(1), 35-49.
Comer, Lucette B. and Tanya Drollinger (1999), “Active Empathetic Listening and Selling Success: A Conceptual Framework,” Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 19(1), 15-29.
Deeter-Schmelz, Dawn R., Daniel J. Goebel and Karen Norman Kennedy (2008), “What are the Characteristics of an Effective Sales Manager? An Exploratory Study Comparing Salesperson and Sales Manager Perspectives,” Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 28 (1), 7-20.
Duan, Changming and Clara E. Hill (1996), "The Current State of Empathy Research," Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43 (July), 261-74.
Gardner, William, L. and Bruce J. Avolio (1998), “The Charismatic Relationship: A Dramaturgical Perspective,” Academy of Management Review, 23 (1), 32-58.
Guerney, B. G. (1988), “Family Relationship Enhancement: A Skill Training Approach,” in L. A. Bond and B. M. Wagner (eds.), Families in Transition: Primary Prevention Programs that Work, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Halone, Kelby and Loretta Pecchioni (2001), “Relational Listening: A Grounded Theoretical Model,” Communication Reports, 14, 59-71.
Hatcher, S. L., M. S. Nadeau, L. K. Walsh, M. Reynolds, J. Galea, and K. Marz (1994), “The Teaching of Empathy for High School and College Students: Testing Rogerian Methods with the Interpersonal Reactivity Index,” Adolescence, 29, 961-74.
Herbeck, T. A. and F. J. Yammarian (1990), “Empathy Training for Hospital Staff Nurses,” Organization Studies, 15, 279-95.
Long, Edgar C. J. (1993), “Maintaining a Stable Marriage: Perspective-Taking as a Predictor of a Propensity to Divorce,” Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 21, 121-38.
Mead, Nancy A. (1986), “Listening and Speaking Skills Assessment,” in Performance Assessment: Methods and Applications, Ronald A. Berk, ed., Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 509-21.
Nichols, Michael P. (1995), The Lost Art of Listening, New York: Guilford Press.
Patore, F. (1995), Empathy Training Course Packet for Medical Students, Valhalla, NY: New York Medical College.
Ramsey, Rosemary P. and Ravipreet S. Sohi (1997). “Listening to Your Customers: The Impact of Perceived Salesperson Listening Behavior on Relational Outcomes,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25 (2), 127-37.
Rogers, Carl R. (1959), "A Theory of Therapy, Personality and Interpersonal Relationships as Developed in the Client-Centered Framework," in Psychology: A Study of a Science,S. Koch, ed., New York: McGraw Hill, 184-256.
Williams, Kaylene C., and Rosann L. Spiro (1985), “Communication Style in Salesperson-Customer Dyad,” Journal of Marketing Research, 22 (November), 434-42.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
About the Authors
Susie Pryor, PhD
Associate Professor of Management, California State University, San Bernard
Dr. Pryor (PhD, University of Nebraska-Lincoln) is an associate professor of management with an emphasis in entrepreneurship at the College of Business and Public Administration at California State University. Having a PhD in marketing, Dr. Pryor’s research interests include the operations of relationship development and social capital among buyers and sellers. She has published in journals such as Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, Journal of Consumer Behaviour, International Journal of Retailing and Distribution Management, Place Branding and Public Diplomacy and Journal of Food Products Marketing. She has been recognized for teaching and research at the University of Nebraska and was awarded the Ned N. Fleming University Teaching Award at Washburn University. Pryor consults with small businesses on strategic marketing and innovation management.
Avinash Malshe, PhD
Associate Professor of Marketing, St. Thomas University
Dr. Malshe (PhD, University of Nebraska-Lincoln) is an associate professor of marketing at the Opus College of Business at St. Thomas University. His primary research interest is marketing strategy, especially the interface between sales and marketing functions and its impact on strategy creation and implementation. He also studies marketing strategy processes and issues related to business ethics. His work is published in marketing and business journals such as Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Journal of Business Research, European Journal of Marketing, Industrial Marketing Management, Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, Journal of Strategic Marketing, Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, International Business Review and International Small Business Journal. He is the inaugural recipient of the Susan E. Heckler Research Excellence Award within the Opus College of Business. Malshe has trained and consulted with business executives in both the for-profit and nonprofit sectors on a variety of marketing issues. He is an active media interviewee and has written numerous Outside Consultant columns in the Minneapolis Star Tribune,in which he advises small businesses on the unique marketing challenges they face.