"After Three Days" in Mark 8:31; 9:31; and 10:34: Subordinating Jesus' Resurrection in the Second Gospel: pg. 399-424
Mark Proctor
Comparing the wording of the passion predictions in Mark 8:31, 9:31, and
10:33 with the importance Paul and others attributed to the “third day”
resurrection motif reveals a distinct peculiarity. Whereas the
primitive gospel claimed Jesus arose “on the third day,” Mark has his
protagonist predicton three separate occasions that he would rise “after
three days.” Mark’s use of meta;trei'" hJmevra"
in 8:31, 9:31, and 10:33 constitutes his deliberate attempt to de-emphasize
traditional teaching about the resurrection by (a) robbing Jesus’s passion
predictions of their numerical precision as a means of (b) subordinating the
resurrection to the account of Jesus’s death.
|  |
|